Archive for the ‘feminism’ Category

h1

Study Confirms Living In Sin Means Fairer Housework Distribution

September 24, 2007

Not-so-new news, but I’ve failed to mention it earlier: this 27 August 2007 press release from George Mason University brings to attention a study which confirms the sad truth: married men do less housework than live-in boyfriends.

The study, published in the Journal of Family Issues, looked at over 17,000 people in 28 countries.

The issue at hand isn’t as simple as married men just not doing the work. The problem, this study suggests, is that the institution of marriage changes division of labor. Even if an egalitarian viewpoint is present in a married relationship, those men still reported doing less housework than their wives.

The study of more than 17,000 people in 28 countries found that married men report doing less housework than men who are live-in boyfriends.

According to Davis, the key finding of the study is that it suggests the institution of marriage changes the division of labor. Couples with an egalitarian view on gender—seeing men and women as equal—are more likely to divide the household chores equally. However, in married relationships, even if an egalitarian viewpoint is present, men still report doing less housework than their wives. According to Shannon Davis, one of the co-authors, “Marriage as an institution seems to have a traditionalizing effect on couples—even couples who see men and women as equal.”

The research does leave room for hope, though: the study did not follow cohabitating couples to see if the distribution of housework changed from before to after marriage. It may be that those who are most concerned with traditional ideas of gender may voluntarily choose to forgo marriage due to its role in prescribing roles and duties to the sexes (particularly in modern times).

h1

An Open Letter to the Leerers and Cat-Callers of NYC (And Elsewhere)…

September 5, 2007

Dear ::ahem:: “Sirs”,

Last Thursday, I was not, as they say, “asking for it” in anyway. That is to say, I was not wearing:

  • a tube top
  • a tank top
  • anything showing an inch of my “breast-eges”
  • short shorts
  • hot shorts
  • shorts with words on the buttocks
  • low-ride anything with my thong hanging out
  • low ride anything with my absence-of-underwear hanging out
  • high-hemlined anything with my panties showing
  • high-hemlined anything with my “va-jay-jay” showing
  • a shirt that bared my shoulders
  • a shirt that bared my elbows or wrists
  • a bottom with any skin above the ankle, nay, even up to and including the ankle, showing

To put it simply, unless my wearing a suit with pants that flatter me and a button-down shirt underneath that doesn’t have a button at the collar (yet nonetheless showed almost no skin past my collar bone) is “asking for it”, I strongly believe that I safely skirted this categorization.

However, this did not seem to stop you.

Read the rest of this entry ?

h1

Whoop-dee-doo

September 4, 2007

If you need any proof that third-wave feminism, or at least, the TV kind, is a mess, just check out this very hilarious column by Lisa de Moraes about Whoopi’s View Debut.

Shut up, Babs! Knock it off, Joy! Put a sock in it, Elisabeth!

Whoopi Goldberg, the Oscar-winning comedy queen, tried to debut on the syndicated talker “The View” this morning, but she barely got a word in edgeways, what with evil stepsisters Barbara Walters, Joy Behar and Elisabeth “LookatmeI’mpreggersagain” Hasselbeck hogging the microphone and mugging for the camera.

“There is nothing that you can do that is not on YouTube, MyFace,” Babs said, which is perhaps the funniest line of the whole show.

Yep, they’ve got woman power.